If you have been reading about retention time and want a single page that covers the useful parts, this is it: definitions, context, how it is studied, and the questions that come up repeatedly.
Last reviewed on 2026-03-18. Where a claim depends on a specific study, the study is described rather than over-claimed.
Practical HPLC testing depends on careful sample preparation and instrument maintenance. Samples may require filtration, dilution, pH adjustment, or extraction to avoid column damage and matrix interference. Mobile phases are degassed and filtered, and columns are equilibrated before injection. Common problems include peak tailing, baseline drift, ghost peaks, carryover, and co-elution of analytes. Documentation of instrument logs, calibration records, and electronic audit trails supports data integrity and traceability. Ongoing training and routine maintenance help reduce variability between analysts and laboratories.
Quality control laboratories use HPLC to check identity, purity, concentration, and stability of raw materials and finished products. A validated method specifies the column, mobile phase, flow rate, detection wavelength, injection volume, and run time. Samples are prepared and compared against reference standards of known concentration. The resulting chromatogram provides quantitative data, such as assay values and impurity levels. This approach is common in pharmaceutical, food, environmental, and industrial testing where consistent measurements are required.
Routine quality control uses system suitability, blank injections, check standards, and control samples to detect drift or contamination. System suitability criteria may specify minimum resolution, maximum tailing factor, and a permitted range for repeated injections. Blank injections reveal carryover or solvent contamination, while check standards confirm calibration accuracy over a batch. Control samples with known analyte levels can show whether results remain within statistical limits. When a control result falls outside limits, the analyst investigates the cause and may invalidate affected results before repeating the batch.
Documentation and traceability are central to regulated HPLC testing. Records typically include instrument logs, column history, mobile-phase preparation, sample preparation, injection sequences, raw chromatograms, and audit trails. Electronic systems may require user access controls, time-stamped changes, and backup procedures. Training records show that analysts are qualified for assigned methods. Audits and inspections check whether written procedures match actual practice and whether deviations are documented. These controls support reproducibility and allow results to be reconstructed if questions arise later.
| Parameter | Typical acceptance criterion | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | ≥ 1.5 | Baseline separation of adjacent peaks |
| Tailing factor | ≤ 2.0 | Peak symmetry measure |
| Theoretical plates | > 2000 | Column efficiency indicator |
| Injection repeatability | ≤ 2% RSD | Relative standard deviation for replicate injections |
| Linearity | r² ≥ 0.995 | Calibration curve over the working range |
High-performance liquid chromatography testing separates components of a liquid sample by forcing a mobile phase through a packed column. The stationary phase inside the column interacts with analytes to different degrees, so each compound exits at a characteristic retention time. A pump delivers solvent at controlled flow and pressure, while an injector introduces a precise sample volume. Detectors such as ultraviolet-visible, fluorescence, refractive index, or mass spectrometric instruments record the separated bands. The resulting chromatogram provides qualitative and quantitative information about the mixture.
Separation modes differ by the chemistry of the stationary phase and the composition of the mobile phase. Reversed-phase testing uses a nonpolar column and polar solvents, making it common for pharmaceutical, environmental, and food analytes. Normal-phase testing uses a polar column and nonpolar solvents for compounds that are poorly retained in reversed-phase systems. Ion-exchange and ion-pair methods separate charged species, while size-exclusion methods sort molecules by hydrodynamic volume. Gradient elution changes solvent strength over time to resolve complex mixtures, and isocratic elution holds solvent composition constant for simpler assays.
Method validation evaluates accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, detection limit, quantitation limit, and robustness. Regulatory guidance for pharmaceuticals, foods, and environmental testing defines expected documentation and acceptance criteria. Verification confirms that a validated method works in a specific laboratory with its own instruments and reagents. Calibration curves use reference standards with known purity and traceability, while measurement uncertainty is estimated from validation data, control charts, and collaborative studies. The scope of validation depends on the method's intended use.
Routine quality control monitors retention time shifts, baseline noise, system pressure, and peak shape. Trends can reveal column aging, mobile phase preparation errors, detector drift, or sample degradation. Corrective actions may include replacing the column, preparing fresh mobile phase, or recalibrating the detector. Stability testing often uses HPLC to measure parent compound loss and degradation product formation. Open questions remain about how accelerated stability results extrapolate to long-term storage under varied conditions.
Quality control for HPLC testing combines scheduled checks, documented procedures, and review of results. Before sample analysis, system suitability testing confirms that the instrument, column, and method meet predefined criteria. Common criteria include resolution between critical peaks, retention time precision, peak tailing, and theoretical plate count. Failure triggers investigation before results are reported. Records link raw data, calculations, instrument logs, and analyst identity to each batch, supporting audits and repeat analysis.
High-performance liquid chromatography, or HPLC, separates dissolved compounds by passing a liquid mobile phase through a packed column. Components distribute differently between the stationary phase and the moving liquid, so they travel at different speeds and exit at different times. A detector records these eluting bands as peaks, and peak area or height relates to amount. The technique supports testing in pharmaceuticals, foods, environmental samples, and industrial chemicals. Quantification usually depends on calibration with known standards.
Several separation modes exist, including reversed-phase, normal-phase, ion-exchange, size-exclusion, and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography. Reversed-phase uses a nonpolar stationary phase with a polar mobile phase and is widely applied to small organic molecules. Gradient elution changes mobile phase composition during the run, while isocratic elution keeps it constant. Column chemistry, particle size, temperature, flow rate, and mobile phase pH all influence retention and resolution. Method development selects conditions that separate analytes from matrix components and from each other.
Detection commonly uses ultraviolet-visible absorbance, fluorescence, refractive index, or mass spectrometry. Ultraviolet detection depends on molecular chromophores that absorb light at specific wavelengths. Mass spectrometry provides mass information and sensitive quantification, often after electrospray ionization. Before sample batches, performance checks examine resolution, elution time repeatability, peak symmetry, and plate count. Matrix effects and co-elution remain recognized uncertainties; formal validation studies and orthogonal detection help address them. Detector choice depends on analyte properties and required sensitivity.
System suitability testing is performed before and during analytical runs to confirm that the instrument and method are working as expected. Typical checks include retention time, peak area precision, resolution between critical pairs, tailing factor, and theoretical plate count. Acceptance criteria are set in the method or pharmacopeial monograph. If a suitability check fails, the run may be rejected and the instrument or sample preparation may need investigation. This practice helps prevent release of data from a system that has drifted out of control.
Quality control samples are inserted at intervals to monitor accuracy and precision throughout a batch. Blank samples detect contamination, while spiked samples assess recovery from the sample matrix. Calibration standards establish the relationship between detector response and concentration, and control samples are prepared independently from them whenever possible. Laboratories also participate in proficiency testing and maintain audit trails, instrument logs, and reagent records. Ongoing review of control charts can reveal trends before they cause out-of-specification results.
Method validation demonstrates that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended purpose. Common validation parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantification, and robustness. Accuracy reflects agreement with a reference value, while precision describes repeatability under defined conditions. Specificity shows whether the method can measure the analyte in the presence of impurities or matrix components. Validation documents are reviewed before a method is used for routine testing or regulatory submissions.
== Interactions == Since bupropion is metabolized to hydroxybupropion by the enzyme CYP2B6, drug interactions with CYP2B6 inhibitors are possible: This includes such medications as paroxetine, sertraline, norfluoxetine (active metabolite of fluoxetine), diazepam, clopidogrel, and orphenadrine. The expected result is an increase in bupropion and a decrease in hydroxybupropion blood concentration. The reverse effect (decrease of bupropion and increase of hydroxybupropion) can be expected with CYP2B6 inducers such as carbamazepine, clotrimazole, rifampicin, ritonavir, St John's wort, and phenobarbital. Indeed, carbamazepine decreases exposure to bupropion by 90% and increases exposure to hydroxybupropion by 94%. Ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir, and efavirenz have been shown to decrease levels of bupropion and/or its metabolites. Ticlopidine and clopidogrel, both potent CYP2B6 inhibitors, have been found to considerably increase bupropion levels as well as decrease levels of its metabolite hydroxybupropion. Bupropion and its metabolites are inhibitors of CYP2D6, with hydroxybupropion responsible for most of the inhibition. Additionally, bupropion and its metabolites may decrease the expression of CYP2D6 in the liver. The end effect is a significant slowing of the clearance of other drugs metabolized by this enzyme. For instance, bupropion has been found to increase area-under-the-curve of desipramine, a CYP2D6 substrate, five-fold. Bupropion has also been found to increase levels of atomoxetine 5.1-fold, while decreasing the exposure to its main metabolite 1.5-fold.
Chloroplast – Cell Centered Database Clegg MT, Gaut BS, Learn GH, Morton BR (July 1994). "Rates and patterns of chloroplast DNA evolution". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 91 (15): 6795–801. Bibcode:1994PNAS...91.6795C. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.15.6795. PMC 44285. PMID 8041699. Co-Extra research on chloroplast transformation NCBI full chloroplast genome
On 16 December 1989, the Hungarian minority in Timișoara held a public protest in response to an attempt by the government to evict Hungarian Reformed church Pastor László Tőkés. In July of that year, in an interview with Hungarian television, Tőkés had criticised the regime's systematisation policy and complained that Romanians did not even know their human rights. As Tőkés described it later, the interview, which had been seen in the border areas and was then spread all over Romania, had "a shock effect upon the Romanians, the Securitate as well, on the people of Romania. [...] [I]t had an unexpected effect upon the public atmosphere in Romania." At the behest of the government, his bishop removed him from his post, thereby depriving him of the right to use the apartment to which he was entitled as a pastor, and assigned him to be a pastor in the countryside. For some time his parishioners gathered around his home to protect him from harassment and eviction. Many passersby spontaneously joined in. As it became clear that the crowd would not disperse, the mayor, Petre Moț, made remarks suggesting that he had overturned the decision to evict Tőkés. Meanwhile, the crowd had grown impatient and, when Moț declined to confirm his statement against the planned eviction in writing, the crowd started to chant anti-communist slogans. Subsequently, police and Securitate forces showed up at the scene. By 19:30 the protest had spread and the original cause became largely irrelevant.
Whereas molecular weight (molar mass) for D-glucose monohydrate is 198.17 g/mol, that for anhydrous D-glucose is 180.16 g/mol The density of these two forms of glucose is also different. In terms of chemical structure, glucose is a monosaccharide, that is, a simple sugar. Glucose contains six carbon atoms and an aldehyde group, and is therefore an aldohexose. The glucose molecule can exist in an open-chain (acyclic) as well as ring (cyclic) form—due to the presence of alcohol and aldehyde or ketone functional groups, the form having the straight chain can easily convert into a chair-like hemiacetal ring structure commonly found in carbohydrates.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
=== 16 March === Government buildings used by the RSF in Ed Daein and Nyala were destroyed by missiles. The SAF also claimed to have taken control of the Family Club, Khartoum 3, and part of Khartoum 2 and cut off the last RSF supply route to the Presidential Palace. Four people were killed and 30 people were injured including 18 children from RSF shelling in Karari, Omdurman. The SAF said that its Armoured Corps had linked up with SAF forces at the General Command headquarters in Khartoum after clearing the People's Teaching Hospital from the RSF.
== History == At least since 1875 there have been reports of automated devices for scientific investigation. These first devices were mostly built by scientists themselves in order to solve problems in the laboratory. After the second world war, companies started to provide automated equipment with greater and greater complexity. Automation steadily spread in laboratories through the 20th century, but then a revolution took place: in the early 1980s, the first fully automated laboratory was opened by Dr. Masahide Sasaki. In 1993, Dr. Rod Markin at the University of Nebraska Medical Center created one of the world's first clinical automated laboratory management systems. In the mid-1990s, he chaired a standards group called the Clinical Testing Automation Standards Steering Committee (CTASSC) of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry, which later evolved into an area committee of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. In 2004, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and more than 300 nationally recognized leaders in academia, industry, government, and the public completed the NIH Roadmap to accelerate medical discovery to improve health. The NIH Roadmap clearly identifies technology development as a mission critical factor in the Molecular Libraries and Imaging Implementation Group (see the first theme – New Pathways to Discovery – at https://web.archive.org/web/20100611171315/http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/). Despite the success of Dr.
==== GABAA receptor positive allosteric modulators ==== Alpidem (Ananxyl; SL800342; SL-800342) – GABAA receptor positive allosteric modulator and nonbenzodiazepine/imidazopyridine – discontinued/withdrawn due to toxicity [43] Alprazolam (Xanax) – GABAA receptor positive allosteric modulator and benzodiazepine
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
Method validation is the documented process of confirming that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended use. It evaluates accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, detection limits, and robustness. Validation criteria depend on the regulatory context and the sample type.
System suitability tests are short checks performed before or during an HPLC run to verify instrument and method performance. They often include resolution, tailing factor, theoretical plates, and injection precision. Results must meet predefined limits for sample data to be accepted.
HPLC retention time alone cannot definitively identify an unknown substance. A match with a reference standard under identical conditions provides supporting evidence. Confirmation typically requires mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, or another orthogonal technique.
Validation establishes suitability for a new method, while verification confirms that a method works in a specific laboratory. Verification is often used when a validated method is adopted with existing equipment and staff. Both rely on documented acceptance criteria.