accuracy comes up often in conversation and rarely with the context attached. Here we lay out the basics in order, then work through the practical considerations.
Last reviewed on 2025-11-18. Where a claim depends on a specific study, the study is described rather than over-claimed.
Method validation establishes that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended purpose. Typical parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, robustness, and solution stability. Accuracy reflects closeness to a reference value, while precision reflects agreement among repeated measurements. Specificity shows whether the method can measure the analyte without interference from matrix components. Validation is documented through protocols and reports, and the required extent depends on the method's use and regulatory context.
Routine quality control uses system suitability, blank injections, check standards, and control samples to detect drift or contamination. System suitability criteria may specify minimum resolution, maximum tailing factor, and a permitted range for repeated injections. Blank injections reveal carryover or solvent contamination, while check standards confirm calibration accuracy over a batch. Control samples with known analyte levels can show whether results remain within statistical limits. When a control result falls outside limits, the analyst investigates the cause and may invalidate affected results before repeating the batch.
Quality control for HPLC testing combines scheduled checks, documented procedures, and review of results. Before sample analysis, system suitability testing confirms that the instrument, column, and method meet predefined criteria. Common criteria include resolution between critical peaks, retention time precision, peak tailing, and theoretical plate count. Failure triggers investigation before results are reported. Records link raw data, calculations, instrument logs, and analyst identity to each batch, supporting audits and repeat analysis.
Method validation evaluates accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, detection limit, quantitation limit, and robustness. Regulatory guidance for pharmaceuticals, foods, and environmental testing defines expected documentation and acceptance criteria. Verification confirms that a validated method works in a specific laboratory with its own instruments and reagents. Calibration curves use reference standards with known purity and traceability, while measurement uncertainty is estimated from validation data, control charts, and collaborative studies. The scope of validation depends on the method's intended use.
Routine quality control monitors retention time shifts, baseline noise, system pressure, and peak shape. Trends can reveal column aging, mobile phase preparation errors, detector drift, or sample degradation. Corrective actions may include replacing the column, preparing fresh mobile phase, or recalibrating the detector. Stability testing often uses HPLC to measure parent compound loss and degradation product formation. Open questions remain about how accelerated stability results extrapolate to long-term storage under varied conditions.
| Property | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | Recovery near 100% | Depends on acceptance criteria and matrix |
| Precision | Relative standard deviation | Often at or below 2% for replicate injections |
| Limit of detection | Signal-to-noise ratio 3:1 | Approximate and method-specific |
| Limit of quantitation | Signal-to-noise ratio 10:1 | Confirmed by precision and accuracy |
| Resolution | 1.5 or greater | Typical system suitability target |
Method validation demonstrates that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended purpose. Common validation parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantification, and robustness. Accuracy reflects agreement with a reference value, while precision describes repeatability under defined conditions. Specificity shows whether the method can measure the analyte in the presence of impurities or matrix components. Validation documents are reviewed before a method is used for routine testing or regulatory submissions.
System suitability testing is performed before and during analytical runs to confirm that the instrument and method are working as expected. Typical checks include retention time, peak area precision, resolution between critical pairs, tailing factor, and theoretical plate count. Acceptance criteria are set in the method or pharmacopeial monograph. If a suitability check fails, the run may be rejected and the instrument or sample preparation may need investigation. This practice helps prevent release of data from a system that has drifted out of control.
Developing an HPLC test begins with defining the analytes, matrix, and required reporting limits. Chemists select a separation mode, column chemistry, mobile phase composition, flow rate, and detection wavelength or mass transition. Experiments then adjust these variables to achieve adequate retention, resolution, and peak shape. System suitability tests confirm that the instrument and method perform consistently before sample analysis. Without suitable resolution, quantitative results may be unreliable. Preliminary runs often use scouting gradients to locate retention windows.
Validation establishes that a method is suitable for its intended purpose. Typical parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantification, robustness, and stability of standards and samples. Acceptance criteria are defined in advance, and results are documented in a validation report. Regulatory guidance for pharmaceuticals, foods, and environmental testing differs, so the applicable framework must be identified. Ongoing verification uses control samples and trend charts after validation. Method transfer to another laboratory may require partial revalidation.
Validation demonstrates that a method is suitable for its intended use. Typical performance characteristics include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, and robustness. Regulators and standards organizations provide frameworks, but specific requirements depend on the application and jurisdiction. System suitability tests are run before sample analysis to confirm resolution, peak symmetry, retention time repeatability, and sensitivity. A validated method is not permanently fixed; changes may require partial or full revalidation.
Routine HPLC testing depends on controlled reagents, calibrated instruments, and documented procedures. Columns degrade over time, so retention times and peak shapes are monitored for drift. Mobile phases are filtered and degassed to prevent pump damage and detector noise. Reference standards must be traceable and stored under suitable conditions. Data handling systems record injections, calculations, and audit trails. Quality control samples interspersed with unknowns help detect errors during a run.
Regulatory and pharmacopeial texts shape how HPLC testing is performed and documented. The International Council for Harmonisation provides validation guidance, while pharmacopeias publish general chromatography chapters and monographs for specific materials. Accreditation standards such as ISO/IEC 17025 address laboratory competence and traceability. Inspectors may review instrument qualification, analyst training, reference material control, and electronic records. Open questions include how best to validate methods for new complex products and how to handle automated data processing. Laboratories generally resolve these issues through risk assessment, method lifecycle management, and documented scientific justification.
In quality control laboratories, HPLC testing supports batch release, raw material checks, stability studies, and impurity profiling. A validated method defines sample preparation, instrument settings, calibration, and acceptance criteria. Analysts compare results with specifications and investigate out-of-specification outcomes before a batch is approved. Documentation includes chromatograms, integration records, audit trails, and reagent details. Because results influence product decisions, laboratories follow formal quality systems and data integrity rules. The exact tests and limits depend on the material, its intended use, and the applicable regulatory framework.
Method validation examines whether an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended purpose. Common parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, detection limit, quantification limit, and robustness. Accuracy describes closeness to a true or accepted value, while precision describes agreement among repeated measurements. Specificity shows whether the method can measure the analyte without interference from related substances. Robustness tests small deliberate changes in flow, temperature, or solvent composition. Validation is not a one-time event; methods may need partial revalidation after changes to instruments, columns, sample handling, or specification limits. Regulatory guidance provides frameworks, but some details remain method-specific.
==== Non-collagen ==== Hydroxyproline is found in few proteins other than collagen. For this reason, hydroxyproline content has been used as an indicator to determine collagen and/or gelatin amount. However, the mammalian proteins elastin and argonaute 2 have collagen-like domains in which hydroxyproline is formed. Some snail poisons, conotoxins, contain hydroxyproline, but lack collagen-like sequences. Hydroxylation of proline has been shown to be involved in targeting Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) alpha subunit (HIF-1 alpha) for degradation by proteolysis. Under normoxia (normal oxygen conditions) EGLN1[1] protein hydroxylates the proline at the 564 position of HIF-1 alpha, which allows ubiquitylation by the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor (pVHL) and subsequent targeting for proteasome degradation. DYRK1A, DYRK1B, protein kinase B, eEF2, IKK2, p53, FOXO3A, CEP192 are also reportedly hydroxylated by PHD1. p53 and MAPH6 are also hydroxylated by PHD3. Free hydroxyproline appears to be an antioxidant, like free proline.
Promethium is a generally synthetic chemical element; it has symbol Pm and atomic number 61. All of its isotopes are radioactive; it is extremely rare, with only about 500–600 grams naturally occurring in the Earth's crust at any given time. Promethium is one of only two radioactive elements that are both preceded and succeeded in the periodic table by elements with stable forms, the other being technetium. Chemically, promethium is a lanthanide. Promethium shows only one stable oxidation state of +3. In 1902 Bohuslav Brauner suggested that there was a then-unknown element with properties intermediate between those of the known elements neodymium (60) and samarium (62); this was confirmed in 1914 by Henry Moseley, who, having measured the atomic numbers of all the elements then known, found that the element with atomic number 61 was missing. In 1926, two groups (one Italian and one American) claimed to have isolated a sample of element 61; both "discoveries" were soon proven to be false. In 1938, during a nuclear experiment conducted at Ohio State University, a few radioactive nuclides were produced that certainly were not radioisotopes of neodymium or samarium, but there was a lack of chemical proof that element 61 was produced, and the discovery was not much recognized. Promethium was first produced and characterized at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in 1945 by the separation and analysis of the fission products of uranium fuel irradiated in a graphite reactor.
=== Anxiety and depression === Tandospirone is most commonly used as a treatment for anxiety and depressive disorders, such as generalised anxiety disorder and dysthymia respectively. For both indications it usually takes a couple of weeks for therapeutic effects to begin to be seen, although at higher doses more rapid anxiolytic responses have been seen. It has also been used successfully as a treatment for bruxism.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
=== Recycling === Nylons is typically used in durable goods, so it makes only a minor contribution to waste streams. Nylons are susceptible to hydrolysis, but the process is slow at room temperature and neutral pH, hence the utility of these materials. Being a robust polymer, nylon resin waste is not often recycled. The rate of hydrolysis increases in the presence of strong acids, a reaction essentially the reverse of their synthesis. Nylons are also the most popular fiber type in the residential carpet industry today. The US EPA estimates that 9.2% of carpet fiber, backing and padding was recycled in 2018, 17.8% was incinerated in waste-to-energy facilities, and 73% was discarded in landfills. Discarded nylon fishing gear such as fishing nets contributes to debris in the ocean. Its production however can use a closed loop during manufacturing, by grinding sprues and runners and mixing them with the virgin granules being consumed by the molding machine. The process of recycling post-consumer nylon waste is expensive and difficult, so few companies utilize it, favoring cheaper newly made plastics for their products instead. US clothing company Patagonia has sold products containing recycled nylon and in the mid-2010s invested in Bureo, a company that recycles nylon from used fishing nets to make sunglasses and skateboards. The Italian company Aquafil has also recycled nylon from fishing nets, to create apparel. Vanden Recycling recycles nylon and other polyamides (PA) and has operations in the UK, Australia, Hong Kong, the UAE, Turkey and Finland.
Dial-out PCR: a highly parallel method for retrieving accurate DNA molecules for gene synthesis. A complex library of DNA molecules is modified with unique flanking tags before massively parallel sequencing. Tag-directed primers then enable the retrieval of molecules with desired sequences by PCR. Digital PCR (dPCR): used to measure the quantity of a target DNA sequence in a DNA sample. The DNA sample is highly diluted so that after running many PCRs in parallel, some of them do not receive a single molecule of the target DNA. The target DNA concentration is calculated using the proportion of negative outcomes. Hence the name 'digital PCR'. Helicase-dependent amplification: similar to traditional PCR, but uses a constant temperature rather than cycling through denaturation and annealing/extension cycles. DNA helicase, an enzyme that unwinds DNA, is used in place of thermal denaturation. Hot start PCR: a technique that reduces non-specific amplification during the initial set up stages of the PCR. It may be performed manually by heating the reaction components to the denaturation temperature (e.g., 95 °C) before adding the polymerase. Specialized enzyme systems have been developed that inhibit the polymerase's activity at ambient temperature, either by the binding of an antibody or by the presence of covalently bound inhibitors that dissociate only after a high-temperature activation step. Hot-start/cold-finish PCR is achieved with new hybrid polymerases that are inactive at ambient temperature and are instantly activated at elongation temperature.
During his rule, Stalin always made the final policy decisions. Otherwise, Soviet foreign policy was set by the commission on the Foreign Policy of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, or by the party's highest body the Politburo. Operations were handled by the separate Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It was known as the People's Commissariat for Foreign Affairs (or Narkomindel), until 1946. The most influential spokesmen were Georgy Chicherin, Maxim Litvinov, Vyacheslav Molotov, Andrey Vyshinsky, and Andrei Gromyko. Intellectuals were based in the Moscow State Institute of International Relations.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
Validation establishes suitability for a new method, while verification confirms that a method works in a specific laboratory. Verification is often used when a validated method is adopted with existing equipment and staff. Both rely on documented acceptance criteria.
Quantification usually compares detector response to a standard curve made from reference standards. The curve may be external, internal, or based on standard addition depending on matrix effects. Results are reported with units and, when required, uncertainty.
Carryover occurs when analyte from a previous injection remains in the system and appears in a later chromatogram. It can come from the injector, column, or tubing. Blank injections and needle washes help detect and reduce it.
System suitability is typically performed before each batch or according to the validated method and laboratory procedure. Some long runs include periodic checks during analysis. The required frequency depends on regulatory expectations and method performance.