If you have been reading about accuracy and want a single page that covers the useful parts, this is it: definitions, context, how it is studied, and the questions that come up repeatedly.
Last reviewed on 2025-12-20. Where a claim depends on a specific study, the study is described rather than over-claimed.
Key performance measures include retention time, peak area, peak height, resolution, tailing factor, and plate count. Retention time helps identify a peak under fixed conditions, but confirmation often requires a second method or detector. Peak area and height relate to concentration through calibration curves, which may be linear or nonlinear depending on the detector response. Resolution describes separation between adjacent peaks, while tailing factor and plate count describe peak shape and column efficiency. Performance checks verify these values before and during a run to confirm that the instrument is performing within limits.
High-performance liquid chromatography testing separates components of a liquid sample by forcing a mobile phase through a packed column. The stationary phase inside the column interacts with analytes to different degrees, so each compound exits at a characteristic retention time. A pump delivers solvent at controlled flow and pressure, while an injector introduces a precise sample volume. Detectors such as ultraviolet-visible, fluorescence, refractive index, or mass spectrometric instruments record the separated bands. The resulting chromatogram provides qualitative and quantitative information about the mixture.
Separation modes differ by the chemistry of the stationary phase and the composition of the mobile phase. Reversed-phase testing uses a nonpolar column and polar solvents, making it common for pharmaceutical, environmental, and food analytes. Normal-phase testing uses a polar column and nonpolar solvents for compounds that are poorly retained in reversed-phase systems. Ion-exchange and ion-pair methods separate charged species, while size-exclusion methods sort molecules by hydrodynamic volume. Gradient elution changes solvent strength over time to resolve complex mixtures, and isocratic elution holds solvent composition constant for simpler assays.
Practical HPLC testing depends on careful sample preparation and instrument maintenance. Samples may require filtration, dilution, pH adjustment, or extraction to avoid column damage and matrix interference. Mobile phases are degassed and filtered, and columns are equilibrated before injection. Common problems include peak tailing, baseline drift, ghost peaks, carryover, and co-elution of analytes. Documentation of instrument logs, calibration records, and electronic audit trails supports data integrity and traceability. Ongoing training and routine maintenance help reduce variability between analysts and laboratories.
Quality control laboratories use HPLC to check identity, purity, concentration, and stability of raw materials and finished products. A validated method specifies the column, mobile phase, flow rate, detection wavelength, injection volume, and run time. Samples are prepared and compared against reference standards of known concentration. The resulting chromatogram provides quantitative data, such as assay values and impurity levels. This approach is common in pharmaceutical, food, environmental, and industrial testing where consistent measurements are required.
Method validation demonstrates that an analytical procedure is suitable for its intended purpose. Typical validation characteristics include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, and robustness. Regulatory guidance from bodies such as the International Council for Harmonisation and the United States Pharmacopeia outlines expectations, though specific criteria depend on the product and method. System suitability tests are run before sample analysis to confirm resolution, peak symmetry, column efficiency, and injection repeatability. Failure of these checks can invalidate a batch of measurements.
| Property | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Separation mode | Reversed-phase | Common for polar and moderately polar analytes |
| Typical column length | 100-250 mm | Shorter columns can reduce run time |
| Particle size | 3-5 micrometers | Smaller particles improve efficiency but raise pressure |
| Flow rate | 0.5-2.0 mL/min | Depends on column dimensions and pressure limits |
| Detection | UV-Vis absorbance | Widely used for compounds with chromophores |
System suitability testing is performed before and during analytical runs to confirm that the instrument and method are working as expected. Common checks include retention time, peak area, resolution between critical pairs, tailing factor, and theoretical plate count. Results are compared with predefined limits, and a failed check requires investigation before sample results are reported. Quality control samples at low, middle, and high concentrations are injected at intervals to monitor accuracy and precision. Blank injections detect carryover and contamination, while control charts track performance over time.
Data handling and documentation are central to HPLC quality control. Electronic systems should have audit trails that record changes to methods, sequences, and results. Integration parameters, such as peak baseline and threshold, can affect reported areas and must be defined in advance. Out-of-specification results trigger a structured investigation that may include reanalysis, instrument checks, and review of sample preparation. Regulatory inspections often examine raw data, audit trails, and training records to verify that reported results are traceable and reliable.
Method validation establishes that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended use. Key parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, and robustness. Accuracy measures agreement with a true or accepted value, while precision describes repeatability and intermediate precision. Specificity confirms that the method measures the analyte without interference from impurities, degradants, or excipients. Validation is documented in a protocol and report, and acceptance criteria are set before experiments begin. Regulatory guidance varies by region, but the general principles are widely harmonized.
Regulatory and pharmacopeial texts shape how HPLC testing is performed and documented. The International Council for Harmonisation provides validation guidance, while pharmacopeias publish general chromatography chapters and monographs for specific materials. Accreditation standards such as ISO/IEC 17025 address laboratory competence and traceability. Inspectors may review instrument qualification, analyst training, reference material control, and electronic records. Open questions include how best to validate methods for new complex products and how to handle automated data processing. Laboratories generally resolve these issues through risk assessment, method lifecycle management, and documented scientific justification.
In quality control laboratories, HPLC testing supports batch release, raw material checks, stability studies, and impurity profiling. A validated method defines sample preparation, instrument settings, calibration, and acceptance criteria. Analysts compare results with specifications and investigate out-of-specification outcomes before a batch is approved. Documentation includes chromatograms, integration records, audit trails, and reagent details. Because results influence product decisions, laboratories follow formal quality systems and data integrity rules. The exact tests and limits depend on the material, its intended use, and the applicable regulatory framework.
Routine HPLC testing depends on controlled reagents, calibrated instruments, and documented procedures. Columns degrade over time, so retention times and peak shapes are monitored for drift. Mobile phases are filtered and degassed to prevent pump damage and detector noise. Reference standards must be traceable and stored under suitable conditions. Data handling systems record injections, calculations, and audit trails. Quality control samples interspersed with unknowns help detect errors during a run.
Developing an HPLC method begins with defining the purpose, such as quantifying a main component, measuring impurities, or confirming identity. Analysts select separation mode, column, mobile phase, detection, and sample preparation based on analyte properties and matrix. Experiments vary solvent strength, pH, buffer type, and temperature to achieve resolution between critical peaks. The goal is a robust method that produces reliable results across instruments and operators. Method development often involves trial runs and statistical optimization.
Routine quality control includes blanks, duplicates, spiked samples, and certified reference materials. Calibration curves are prepared with standards at several concentrations, and the detector response is checked for linearity. Carryover, column aging, mobile phase evaporation, and temperature drift can shift retention times or peak areas. Maintenance such as replacing seals, filters, and columns helps prevent failures. Records of injections, integration, and deviations support traceability. Audits may request raw data and instrument logs for each batch.
Developing an HPLC test begins with defining the analytes, matrix, and required reporting limits. Chemists select a separation mode, column chemistry, mobile phase composition, flow rate, and detection wavelength or mass transition. Experiments then adjust these variables to achieve adequate retention, resolution, and peak shape. System suitability tests confirm that the instrument and method perform consistently before sample analysis. Without suitable resolution, quantitative results may be unreliable. Preliminary runs often use scouting gradients to locate retention windows.
Validation establishes that a method is suitable for its intended purpose. Typical parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantification, robustness, and stability of standards and samples. Acceptance criteria are defined in advance, and results are documented in a validation report. Regulatory guidance for pharmaceuticals, foods, and environmental testing differs, so the applicable framework must be identified. Ongoing verification uses control samples and trend charts after validation. Method transfer to another laboratory may require partial revalidation.
=== Media === The most influential newspapers in the country were the Rhodesia Herald in Salisbury and The Chronicle in Bulawayo. Following UDI, in 1976, the state-run Rhodesian Broadcasting Corporation (RBC) took over the privately owned Rhodesia Television (RTV) service, in which it had previously acquired a 51 percent stake. Among the news magazines published in Rhodesia under UDI were the Illustrated Life Rhodesia, while The Valiant Years by Beryl Salt told the history of Rhodesia from 1890 to 1978 entirely through the medium of facsimile reproduction of articles and headlines from Rhodesian newspapers.
Histiocytoma is a common, benign, cutaneous neoplasm in dogs. Histiocytomas usually occur as solitary lesions, which spontaneously regress, and seldom recur. They can occur in dogs of all ages, but are more likely in dogs under three years of age. Epidermal invasion by cells of histiocytoma frequently occurs and intra-epidermal nests of histiocytes resemble Pautrier's aggregates, characteristically found in epidermotropic lymphoma (Mycosis Fungoides or MF). Epidermal invasion in histiocytoma, or presence of simultaneous multiple histiocytomas, especially in aged dogs, can appear similar to MF or non-epidermotropic cutaneous lymphoma (NECL). Multiple histiocytomas may look like cutaneous histiocytosis, although morphologically histiocytomas are consistently epidermotropic and commonly epidermally invasive, these are not features of cutaneous histiocytosis. Delayed regression of multiple histiocytomas can occur and lesions can persist for up to 10 months.
Overall the missing information include[s] quantitative data on the composition and specifications of yohimbe bark and its preparations used in food and food supplements covering other alkaloids besides yohimbine, data on the bioavailability of active ingredients from the yohimbe bark extract and data on the toxicity of well specified individual preparations of yohimbe bark and the major yohimbe bark alkaloids, especially regarding subchronic toxicity, genotoxicity and reproductive toxicity. One study found that samples of brands sold in American brick-and-mortar stores contained highly variable amounts of yohimbine, with some brands of "yohimbe" not containing yohimbine from the P. johimbe tree, and other products containing no yohimbine at all. Labeling claims were often misleading. In analyses by other laboratories for products sold in the US, in other countries, and on the internet, highly variable content levels of yohimbine were revealed. Yohimbe sold in markets in West Africa where the tree grows may be adulterated with other species of the genus Pausinystalia, which contain little yohimbine. The amounts of alkaloid found even in genuine P. johimbe bark vary considerably, depending on the source of the bark (roots, stem, branches, height).
== History == CD38 was first identified in 1980 as a surface marker (cluster of differentiation) of thymus cell lymphocytes. In 1992 it was additionally described as a surface marker on B cells, monocytes, and natural killer cells (NK cells). About the same time, CD38 was discovered to be not simply a marker of cell types, but an activator of B cells and T cells. In 1992 the enzymatic activity of CD38 was discovered, having the capacity to synthesize the calcium-releasing second messengers cyclic ADP-ribose (cADPR) and nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAADP).
There are differences in the regulation for the release of GMOs between countries, with some of the most marked differences occurring between the US and Europe. Regulation varies in a given country depending on the intended use of the products of the genetic engineering. For example, a crop not intended for food use is generally not reviewed by authorities responsible for food safety. Some nations have banned the release of GMOs or restricted their use, and others permit them with widely differing degrees of regulation. In 2016, thirty eight countries officially ban or prohibit the cultivation of GMOs and nine (Algeria, Bhutan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Madagascar, Peru, Russia, Venezuela and Zimbabwe) ban their importation. Most countries that do not allow GMO cultivation do permit research using GMOs. Despite regulation, illegal releases have sometimes occurred, due to weakness of enforcement. The European Union (EU) differentiates between approval for cultivation within the EU and approval for import and processing. While only a few GMOs have been approved for cultivation in the EU a number of GMOs have been approved for import and processing. The cultivation of GMOs has triggered a debate about the market for GMOs in Europe. Depending on the coexistence regulations, incentives for cultivation of GM crops differ. The US policy does not focus on the process as much as other countries, looks at verifiable scientific risks and uses the concept of substantial equivalence. Whether gene edited organisms should be regulated the same as genetically modified organism is debated.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
=== As an enzyme for catalytic activity === Cytochrome c has also been widely studied as an enzyme with peroxidase-like activity. Cytochrome c was conjugated to charged polymer to test its peroxidase-like activity. Inspired from natural examples of enzyme encapsulation in protein-based cage structures (Example: Carboxysomes, ferritin, and encapsulin), Cytochrome c was encapsulated in a 9 nm small self-assembling DNA binding protein from nutrient starved cells (Dps) protein cage using chimeric self-assembly approach. Authors observed unique catalytic activity behavior upon encapsulating enzyme inside a protein-cage, which was different from enzyme in solution. This was attributed to local microenvironment provided by Dps nanocage's interior cavity which is different than bulk.
== O == George Andrew Olah (1927–2017), Hungarian and American chemist who worked on the generation and reactivity of carbocations via superacids; 1994 Nobel Prize in Chemistry Marilyn Olmstead (1943–2020), American chemist, expert in small-molecule crystallography Fred Olsen (1891–1986), British-born American chemist, inventor of the ball propellant manufacturing process Lars Onsager (1903–1976), Norwegian and American physical chemist and theoretical physicist who corrected the Debye-Hückel theory of electrolytic solutions, 1968 Nobel Prize in Chemistry Tony Orchard (1941–2005), British inorganic chemist whose research helped to lay the foundations of much modern consumer electronic technology Joan Oró (1923–2004), Spanish (Catalan) biochemist known for studies of the origin of life Hans Christian Ørsted (1777–1851), Danish chemist and physicist who discovered that electric currents create magnetic fields Wilhelm Ostwald (1853–1932), Baltic German physical chemist, 1909 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for contributions to the fields of catalysis, chemical equilibria and reaction velocities Larry E. Overman (born 1943), American organic chemist developing chemical reactions, particularly transition metal catalyzed reactions Geoffrey Ozin (DPhil 1967), British materials chemist known for research on nanomaterials
Brincidofovir is one of several experimental drugs administered to a small number of patients to treat Ebola virus disease during the 2014 outbreak. The WHO published a report on the ethics of using unregistered interventions to treat Ebola, where they concluded that "In the particular context of the current Ebola outbreak in West Africa, it is ethically acceptable to offer unproven interventions that have shown promising results in the laboratory and in animal models but have not yet been evaluated for safety and efficacy in humans as potential treatment or prevention."
The ErbB protein family or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family is a family of four structurally related receptor tyrosine kinases. Insufficient ErbB signaling in humans is associated with the development of neurodegenerative diseases, such as multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer's disease. In mice, loss of signaling by any member of the ErbB family results in embryonic lethality with defects in organs including the lungs, skin, heart, and brain. Excessive ErbB signaling is associated with the development of a wide variety of types of solid tumor. ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 are found in many human cancers and their excessive signaling may be critical factors in the development and malignancy of these tumors.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
It measures the amounts and identities of compounds in liquid samples by separation and detection. Depending on the detector and reference standards, results can be qualitative or quantitative. The technique is used in fields such as pharmaceutical analysis, food safety, and environmental monitoring.
Performance checks confirm that the chromatographic system works within preset limits before results are accepted. They examine factors such as peak resolution, tailing, and repeatability. If criteria fail, the run may need correction or repetition.
Retention time alone is not definitive proof because other compounds can elute at similar times. Confirmation usually uses a second method, a different column, or a detector such as mass spectrometry. Authentic standards strengthen identification.
Method validation is the documented process of confirming that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended use. It evaluates accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, detection limits, and robustness. Validation criteria depend on the regulatory context and the sample type.